Starting a superstructure is only the beginning. The real task is envisioning what it can do, how it will work, and who you need to work with. If you're not a member, consider joining now. If you are a member, be bold, jump in, and use the superstructure to start organizing for survival. Edit it, add to the vision, and make it real, online and off. And don't forget to rave.

More about Superstructures

  • Quantum Governance

    Ziggy says there's a 73% chance we can save the world...
  • Founder: Lord Samwise

    politics, quantum, revolutionary,

  • Who We Need
    Dreamers, philosophers, architects, physicists, biologists, quantum mechanics, sociologists, political scientists, historians, futurologists, revolutionaries...
  • How to join
  • Mission

    "Scientific, spiritual, philosophical, and mythological worldviews, shaped by available technologies, have provided the basic principles and values for the creation of social order. Indeed, at every size and scale, political and social experimentation has been a necessary and persistent human activity. However, with the exception of the relatively short-lived experiment with centralized communist statism, there has been little true innovation in governance since the creation of the U.S. Constitution. If mechanical governance is fatally flawed both technologically and cosmologically, then where else can we look?"

    http://www.superstructgame.org/s/post_newtonian_governance

    One of the key questions facing us here at the brink of collapse is how to re-orchestrate society and government in light of our post-Newtonian, quantum paradigm.  The purpose of this SuperStruct is to generate radical, world-changing ideas that will allow humanity to not only survive the superthreats, but emerge the other side stronger than ever.

  • What we can accomplish
    • Political power structures orginating from an alpha-male oriented society have traditionally been defined by top-down, pyramidal organistational hierarchies.  While the pendulum-swing of governmental forms has produced differing distribution of executive powers, even in Western democratic systems the locality of participants and the lack of cross-council forums has lumped and locked citizen electors into predefined categories.  New user-defined power structures are required to capitalise on the decentralisation of thought made available by emergent social phenomena.

      We need to begin creating governance by common interest, not vested-interest.  Informing people of the choices available to them and allowing them to choose for themselves whom to elect and why at a community-upward scale is an essential step in breaking through currently enforced, parochial democratic boundaries, and a first step on the road to larger, more adaptable decision-making structures.  We're all in this together.

  • How this superstruct works
    • Towards a theory of Quantum Government

      Quantum society 

      According to quantum scientists, the fundamental building blocks of our reality – the basic elements from which everything else is formed – are best described as packets of energy.  These packets are by no means uniform in character or form; some are exotic, capable of remarkable feats of teleportation, even bi-presence; others are less spectacular, but no less remarkable.  Whether exotic or reserved however, each of these packets of energy plays a vital role in maintaining the fabric of the universe in which we live. 

      Just like these packets of energy, human society is filled with unique individuals, brimming with creative energy and remarkable talents.  In a quantum model of governance, every person would be considered equally vital to the whole, regardless of race, gender, creed or pedigree.  The myriad differences in society would be celebrated, but the fact that every single person contains the same creative energy - the same intrinsic significance - would also be acknowledged.

       

      A relational model

      Quantum mechanics is an inherently relational science.  Relationships between quantum packets are complex and convoluted – some quantum particles have only ever been observed in communities of two of more; others seem to be disengaged with their immediate neighbours, but have an impact on distant packets.  Understanding these intricate and often bizarre relationships is one of the key goals of quantum research.

      Just like quantum packets, a quantum society would exist in community with itself.  As history has shown, humans are an irrepressibly social species – we actively seek out groups and large numbers with whom to share our existence.  This is not to say that individuals would be denied the option of self-isolation or solitude in a quantum society, but rather that society would be radically inclusive, placing a high value on meaningful interaction, dialogue and cooperation, rather than self-serving ambition and segregation.  Just like the interactions between our infinitesimal counterparts, life in the quantum society would be discrete yet deeply interdependent.  This complex duality of valuing both community and individuality in equal measure highlights another important aspect of quantum theory that should inform our model of quantum governance...

       

      Both/And, not Either/Or

      In a Newtonian universe, everything is binary: either This, or That.  In a quantum universe however, the possibility of a third option emerges alongside – perhaps even surpasses – this binary concept.  That concept is Both/And.  Both/And is typically explained by the fact that, while energy was previously believed to be divided into particles and waves, light has been proven to exist as both a particle AND a wave.  This has complex ramifications for physicists, but also for theories of quantum governance. 

      We have already discussed that society would simultaneously prize individuality and community.  WHAT OTHER EXAMPLES OF DUALITY ARE THERE IN QUANTUM SOCIETY?

       

      Entanglement

      We have already seen that relationships are integral to quantum reality.  One fascinating element of these relationships is the fact that they are often deeply symbiotic in nature.  That is to say that instigating a change in one quantum packet can have direct repercussions for other packets, both near and far.  Indeed, some quantum relationships are so intimately related that they demonstrate super-symmetrical qualities.  That is to say that some particles directly mirror others; spin one particle backwards and its mirror will naturally echo the reversal of its symmetrical opposite.

      Understanding quantum entanglement raises several important issues for quantum political scientists.  Perhaps most immediate of these implications relates to how government structures should be regulated in a quantum system.

      Just as relationships between quantum packets are symmetrically balanced, so the relationship between individuals and the government should be meticulously balanced, with neither side holding too much power over the other.  In other words, quantum politics should be subject to natural (but deliberately implemented) checks and balances that divide power equally between various ‘symmetrical’ institutions.  It has even been suggested that there might be more than one PoTUS at a time in the future (although Q Govt officials have already voiced suspicions that the USA as it exists today is unlikely to survive the transition to Quantum Governance, so the concept of multiple presidents is probably moot).  Just as redundancy is built into biological eco-systems, its role in quantum governence needs to be careful considered.

      Clearly, the danger of spreading executive power across ‘opposing’ groups risks undermining the efficacy of both and therefore the stagnation of the political system.  This remains an issue that the Q Govt brain-team are seeking to overcome.  Since the majority of day to day decision-making will take place on the local, democratic council level, this kind of stalemate scenario should be uncommon (it has hardly been a problem for the UK or US Government, who both employ a primitive version of this system).  In the event that a stalemate does arise, it may be appropriate for an external adjudicator to make an executive decision.

       

      Further debate about entanglement

      "In the event that a stalemate [between city-states, e.g. New York and Chigago in a constellation] does arise, it may be appropriate for an external adjudicator to make an executive decision."

      That doesn't sound very quantum to me.  The system is everything, no position is outside or above the system to adjudicate.

      City states will be far more nimble, energetic, dynamic, responsive and protean structures than nation states.  If a constellation of city-states looses energy, becomes stuck, static, locked into some state, either the internal dynamics from within individual city states will force a change of conditions which will break the state, or the constellation will decay or break apart to re-constitute itself in new constellations with new members.

      Trust the system.

      (I agree - I read that back and realised that it sounded far too dull, so I've scrapped it!  Excellent contribution re. structural (re)formation - thanks!  Lord Samwise)

       

      Unpredictable?

      The other major implication of quantum entanglement for post-Newtonian governance is complexity.

      Since discoveries in quantum mechanics have blown predictable, Newtonian theories out of the water, one of the few certainties of quantum mechanics has that it is essentially unpredictable.  However, as scientists come to understand more and more about quantum mechanics, it seems increasingly likely that events on a quantum level are not truly unpredictable, but simply infinitely more complex than ever previously imagined.

      This complexity is equally true of human society and therefore of quantum government.  The actions of an individual in one location can have a remarkable and unexpected impact on another seemingly disconnected individual or group.  Because of this, one key facet of quantum government is recognising that every action can have unexpected and exotic consequences.  In practise, this means that the outcome of any given policy decision or action is nowhere near as predictable as previously supposed: removing a dictator from power does not necessarily bring democracy or stability, policies intended to combat climate change can created crises in other systems, such as the economy and food markets.

       

      The Way of Complexity

      Quantum research has demonstrated that reality is far more complex than we had ever previously imagined.  It is essential that Quantum Governance embraces this complexity as it seeks to construct its post-Newtonian socio-political and economic models.  Much of our inspiration can be taken from the Natural Kingdom, where remarkable complexity is clearly evident on every level. 

      Unlike ‘artificial’ human structures, ‘natural’ biological systems are unconsciously self-organised, meticulously self-regulating and mutually beneficial to all parties.  Where humanity has over-exploited and acted selfishly, natural ecosystems always strive for balance and sustainability. 

      Every biological system – from the collaboration of cells that form each of us, to the sprawling array of ecosystems that inhabit our planet – exists in a complex dance of symbiosis; a change in one variable has consequences for a myriad of other elements.  A quantum society and its government would bear this reality in mind when planning new organisational structures.  This means no more hyper-exploitation of resources and of each other.  The way of complexity dictates that while humanity may be pinnacle of evolution, we cannot survive independent of the other elements that comprise creation.  In order to guarantee our own survival, we need to understand that the rest of the system needs to survive as well. 

       

      The Power of Observation

      In a quantum universe, the simple act of observation can radically change the course of events.  By observing (or in some cases trying to observe) quantum mechanics in action, we introduce additional variables which distort the pre-existant reality.  This concept was expounded by the German scientist, Werner Heisenberg, paraphrased here by the highly respected commentator, Bill Bailey:

      “The particle. Very difficult to measure the particle.  To measure it you must shine light upon it, but by doing so you distort the image of the particle making it impossible to take an accurate reading.  I used smaller and smaller amounts of light, but still to no avail.  Eventually I used the smallest amount of light known to man – the glove box light of a 1974 Austin Maxi. Still this was too much light!”

      In the context of quantum politics, observation can be equally effective at altering the nature of our reality.  Intensive public observation discourages corruption at the source and can challenge any existing dishonesty; if individuals know that they could be being watched at any time, they will temper their behaviour accordingly.  Of course, there must be careful limits and controls on this system – we do not wish to create a climate of fearful paranoia akin to the police states of East Germany or Pol Pot’s Cambodia, after all.  To avoid this fate, it will be essential that observation and the power inherent therein is open to everyone, not just a powerful elite.

      By harnessing the power of observation, Quantum Governance would seek to establish a community where anyone who can provide appropriate evidence has the power to challenge perceived corruption at whatever level, where large power-brokers are held under close public scrunity, and genuinely democratic values allow the voice of every individual to be heard equally, regardless of social standing or influence.

      To support this new, all-access approach to observation, the Q Govt team is recruiting individuals to become the first Free Radicals – roving anti-corruption specialists who will themselves seek to uncover illicit dealings, but also support local communities in identifying, challenging and preventing corruption for themselves.  (Note: to avoid Free Radicals from becoming the Stassi of tomorrow, their powers and influence will be no greater than anyone else in society’s.  They will simply foster an environment of scrutiny and an intolerance of corrupt behaviour that will eventually become the norm within Quantum Society).

       

      String Theory

      The Holy Grail of Quantum mechanics is the quantum string – an almost mythical entity that weaves every complex and unfathomable element of quantum mechanics together. 

      Probably. 

      To ensure success, Quantum Governance must search out its own unifying threads which can connect and unify each element of its manifesto into a common philosophy, a vision that encapsulates, inspires and informs the worldview of its new society. 

      There is perhaps an element of the spiritual in this search – just as belief in quantum strings requires faith, so too does belief in quantum society.  We cannot be certain that we have built the necessary safeguards to protect against the evils of corruption and despotism, but we have faith in the fundamental potential for good within human society.  We cannot even be certain that we have understood enough quantum mechanics to build a societal model that reflects it accurately, but we have faith that our revolutionary system will sustain us beyond the current crises and into the next millennia.

      Quantum is more than just a political manifesto; it is a way of life, a philosophy, a worldview.  It is the tool we need to change the way we live and interact, the way we organise our society and our economy, the way we visualise our place in the universe.  If we can unite the world behind this unifying thread – our own quantum string – then we can create a society that will not only outlast the survival horizon, but emerge the other side stronger and better than ever.  

      [Cue inspiring swell of music!]

       

       

  • Other information
    • *Breaking News* We won an award! Get in!

      'The MindStruct Award for the Most Delicious Food for Thought'.

      Good work folks and thanks Jane/avantgame!

       

      It's the final straight.  The End is Nigh! 

      Any final additions or words of wisdom to share that will make our Quantum 'Struct stand out from the crowd?  Got an idea for how whales or other animals might shape Quantum thinking?  Want to ponder how quantum foreign/security/health policy might work? 

      Then get cracking - just a few short hours remain and I want us to win something on Monday!  Thanks for all your excellent contributions and ideas.  It's been fun exploring the future with y'all.

      Lord Samwise

       

      -------------------------------------------------------------------

      Ooh, we won a (super?)badge - good work guys and girls!

      We're also up for one of the superstruct honours: "The Strangestruct Award--for the superstructure that takes the most off-the-wall, unexpected, and left-field approach."  Let's see if we can make some final additions to this struct to get us ahead of the competition...

      Thanks for all your contributions and comments thus far.

      Lord Samwise

       

      Related Stories (the section below always deletes the text for some reason)

      Detroit embraces Quantum Governance

      Quantum manifesto implemented in Bristol, UK

       

  • Discuss this superstructure
    • Some more thoughts (22.10.19)

      How would such a system be organised?

      City-state model

      • Self-sustainable scale with agricultural/commercial/technological capacity to meet is immediate needs, most people happy to stay in local sphere
      • City-states could specialise in an area relevant to their location (eg. Fishing for coastal collectives, arable/dairy/meat for those inland, depending on habitat).  This would allow trade and dialogue between neighbouring communities (and those farther afield).  Ref: The Fife Dieters, http://fifediet.wordpress.com/
      • Communal approach to government / economics / agriculture etc
      • A democratic system, with city-state reps sent to regional / national / international forums.  (Note quantum Both/And: local and (inter)national / decentralised and centralised power).
      • Formation of larger conglomerations (‘superstructs’?) as and when to meet extraordinary needs; fluidity
      • A biological model – cells operate independently, but unite to form larger, more complex organisms for mutual benefit

       

      Feedback on the city-state model

      this is an enjoyable idea. For a start it's graspable - which is not usually a strength of quantum anything.

      Graspability is valuable because it is what will release energy in the system. If people are particles then they need to be zipping around if quantam governance is going to work (stretching the physics metaphor well beyond what's decent).

      It should be fairly easy to generate loyalty to a city-state, and from loyalty comes commitment to make its institutions work. It's also easily contrastable as a unit of organisation with the nation-state, which most people seem to have given up caring about, and least in the sense that they care to participate in politics. And quite rightly too, because politics is done by small groups of well paid lobbyists moving in tiny geographical and social circles of influence. The city-state offers and opportunity to break those circles, if only by balancing them.

      There is probably lots of supporting evidence for city-states in economics and human geography. Regions (city states in all but name) are often talked about as units of regeneration, and how different would city states be from federal models of regional government in Germany, the US, or indeed the city states of Italy.

      What would be unusual (?) would be for these city-states to be given enough power to form their own supra-national constellations at the expense of their "host" nations. 

      There is lots of opportunity for unpredictable outcomes. For example London and New York might form an alliance for their own mutual benefit which would certainly be too great forany counterweight from continental europe, while Californian cities are most likely to form alliances around the pacific rim. In truth, most of this probably happens unofficialy already, certainly given the lobbying weight that bankers in London and New York are able to throw around.

      The idea of city-states put lots into play, which has a very quantum feel, but study of  Machiavelli and the Renaissance might also be a good idea.

       

      PROBLEMS: 

      1. How to avoid corruption / abuse of power?

      • Democracy; everyone can have a say (very localised system), the more people involved from more backgrounds the better / safer
      • Roving anti-corruption individuals/groups? Not vigilantes, authorised and respected external moderators, ‘Free radicals’
      • Public observation of decisions / process

       

      2. If there are lots of voices trying to be heard, how will anything ever get done?

      • Need for executive power / decision maker?
      • Need to establish / foster consensus and common purpose
      3. Will the power brokers of nation states be prepared to give up their centralised levers of power?

       

      QUESTIONS:

      1. Should a quantum society be post-financial?

      • Can we exist in practical communism, not the lowest common denominator model, but in sufficiency/surplus?
      • Is a return to trade and exchange a step backwards or forwards? 

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Let's Go Quantum Bonkers!

      Having come up with something remarkably sensible in city-states, this section is to apply ideas from quantum physics to government in the most wilfully bizarre way possible. Such ideas should stay within the bounds of this section, but in best quantum fashion, who knows where they may end up.

      fisharepeopletoo

       

       

      Re. Entanglement – relationships are symbiotic, (checked &) balanced, super-symmetrical, integrated - actions have consquences

      i/ ubiquitous sensor networks, online behaviour, data mining etc etc are used to visualise every citizen's “ripples”, the knock-on effect of everything they do that can be measured and visualised. The extent of those ripples are given human representation as people in my own city and other cities. If my ripples wash over someone else's doorstep across the world, I have to negotiate some form of reparation directly with that person. Most likely these ripples with wash from the developed world to the developing world? But what if a call centre worker in India undercuts my wages? And what about the manager in my city who transfers the jobs there? Actions have consequences, ripples give consequences faces. What mechanisms can we put in place to diffuse the incendiary consequences of these chains of responsibility (and guilt)? Will the chains always be negative, what about positive consequences? [other superstructs are probably covering sensor networks for environmental monitoring]

       

       

      ii/ Football [soccer]. The European Champion's League is already a hugely visible expression of city-state identity in Europe, and watched around the world.

      Why can't a self-governing “league” (“in league with”, historically, etymologically a league is an association rather than a ladder) of cities already abiding by a self-generating set of rules be transformed into a flexible, ad-hoc council of city-states? How can the existing structure with its competitive, winner-takes-all focus, be turned into a free association with open entry, albeit with some inevitable self interest among members?

      Can UEFA (Union of European Football Associations), as the convenors of a self governing league of city states, supplant the EU, the bureaucracy of outdated nation states. 

       

      Slogans

      The city-state movement needs some slogans:

      "The centre is nowhere the edges are everywhere!"

      "No sun, only stars!"

      "Viva marginalista!"

       "The geographical is political!"

      "Nation states are, like, so century before last!"

       

      The Constellation Flag

      I propose something modelled on the maps of particles and their tracks . We'll call this flag "the constellation" just because it's a nice word with positive poetic associations. But the look of this flag is completely open to interpretation by anyone who wants to. Artists, designers and infant school children can represent a constellation of particles and their tracks in any way they like, and if they say its our flag, its our flag. Rather than pledging allegiance to The Flag, children learn to make their own.

      All that a city needs to do to declare its quantum status is take down the national flag and fly a constellation flag over its town hall. From then on its a quantum city and can begin linking with any, all or no other quantum cities it likes, anywhere in the world.

      Votes for Ghosts!In the legislature of any quantum city, the voices of ancestors and those yet to be conceived will be given voting weight or equal voice. A certain number of members of the legislature (or city-wide deliberative/consultative body) will be elected or nominated to represent those who lived and died in the city, and those who are yet to be born. The numbers of such representatives will be calculated according to birth rates, age and size of the city and so on, but their votes/arguments will carry the same weight as an equal number of representatives of the living.The role of the representatives will be to make sure that the legislature takes account of tradition, history, continuity and sacrifice in the past, and consequences in the future(that sounds slightly linear and non- quantum, but perhaps it's the system being in all possible states at once).These representatives of ghosts and not-yet-created souls will be given, or elected to, the role for a fixed term, and be expected to have demonstrated independence from any faction.Giving weight to tradition sounds like it might be quite conservative, but there are lots of situations where considering "preservation" might lead to quite radical conclusions for future action.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       

      Here are  some of my initial thoughts on developing a model of Quantum Governance.  Please have a read and make comments; take an idea and flesh it out into a more complete policy, if you like.  Let's come up with a manifesto (and win some badges in the process!)

      By the way, I am not a physicist, so all the scientific concepts/terms have been gleaned from Wikipedia articles.  Feel free to correct or improve my interpretation where necessary.

      Lord Samwise

       

      KEY CONCEPTS:

      Packets of energy – fields/particles = people – all shapes and sizes and creeds

      Not ‘either/or’, but Both/And

      Relational – particles/people exist in community; discrete yet deeply interdependent

      Entanglement – relationships are symbiotic, (checked &) balanced, super-symmetrical, integrated - actions have consquences

      Unpredictable? – or perhaps just infinitely more complex than previously realised – recognising that every action can have unexpected and exotic consequences

      Observation – can change outcomes/natures/properties (for the better?) – need for mutual accountability

      Systems / fields / complexity – biological / ecological model – self-organising, mutually beneficial, self-regulating – humanity may be the pinnacle of creation, but it cannot survive without the other elements in the system – no more hyper-exploitation of resources / each other.  Need to understand the whole.

      String Theory – everything connected by unifying threads – a central purpose / philosophy holding it all together?

      Undeniable element of faith / spirituality – we can’t know for certain, we simply believe that this is how it is…

       

      Discussion Page: Quantum Governance

  • Related stories
  • Other superstructures we are collaborating with
    • Harnessing the Power of Observation

      To combat the risk of corruption and despotism within the new system, Q Govt is in negotiations with International Peace Report to employ their all-access observation and whistle-blowing system.  The infrastructure will be maintained by Free Radicals, but everyone will be encouraged and empowered through this system to record, expose and uproot any remaining bastions of corruption.

      Restoring Relationships 

      The success of quantum society relies heavily on developing relational interdependence - a reality that can only be achieved if people's faith in each other can be restored and the gulf of paranoia overcome.  To promote the restoration of this trust and the formation of meaningful relationships, Q Govt has also approached TrustNet, whose innovative tag system allows individuals and communities to identify reliable or trustworthy people electronically.  If we can restore relationships, we can stem the growth of fear and isolationism that plagues our failing society.

      Quantum Economics 

      A new socio-political system requires a new economic model that matches its core vision and values.  To help us achieve this ambitious goal, the Q Govt team have approached Beyond Capitalism, whose are currently engaged in the vital search for a new, non-exploitative economic system that will transcend and supplant existing capitalism concepts. 

      The model favoured by many quantum economists is 'Competitive Benevolence'.  This ground-breaking system aims to strike a dynamic balance between capitalist enterprise and socialist collectivism, thereby achieving the quantum principle of Both/And.  Under Competitive Benevolence, just as in capitalist systems, individuals are encouraged to work hard, innovate, and expand their enterprise.  These competitive elements are essential to furthering human/technological/scientific development.  However, there will also be a strong incentive to invest in the community; not to hang on to wealth, but to share the benefits of success throughout the quantum society. 

      Tired of the neo-fascist consumerism of the early 21st century, quantum societies will champion socially responsible, post-consumer values that echo our newfound understanding of our place in the wider quantum context.  With relationships of trust restored between individuals, quantum societies will seek to support their neighbours and friends generously, sharing resources and finances freely and without expectation of anything in return (though in this quantum universe where consequences are largely unpredictable, a return favour may ultimately be given).  In this way, a competitive element will emerge in acts of benevolence – not kindness in exchange for some immediate reward, but based on the knowledge that what is good for society is good for me.  If I give this much away, what will be the outcome?  We will become competitive with ourselves as we seek to discover just how generous we are willing to be.

      To achieve these exciting ambitions, Q Govt are working alongside The Potlatch Economy, who promote and facilitate the free exchange of surplus between neighbours and the needy: "You give your neighbor some apples from your tree, and they may give you a pie or some cider, or help fix your porch. Each of you may well think they got the better of the deal, and rightly so... We have charities and freecycle, but considering the incredible material wealth, the real surplus that most [of us] now possess: the garages with no space for cars because they are filled with what they ought to consider junk, but which could be a treasure or a needed material for someone else... How many lawnmowers and hedge trimmers are needed on any given block?  There is an amazing potential to redistibute the 'wealth' in our society, voluntarily." 

      Another SuperStruct we are partnering with in pursuit of quantum economics is Besom, who share a similar mission to Potlatch, following the mantra ‘connecting those who have with those who need’: Besom provides a bridge between those people and groups that have resources and skills to share, and those who are in need.  Most people don't know how to help those from outside their own immediate social sphere or cultural background - Besom creates those bridges and facilitates deeper and more meaningful connectivity throughout society, alleviating suffering in the process.

       Complexity: A Cross-Species Collaboration

      In order to better understand the remarkable complexity that infuses the Natural World, and thereby improve the involvement of complexity theory in our Quantum Manifesto, Q Govt are engaged in an exciting dialogue with cross-species communication specialists, AnimalSpeakers.  We have heard some particularly interesting suggestions regarding the quantum societal arrangements among whales.  More on this intruiging development to follow.

      Contigency Arrangements

      Recognising the potentially uncomfortable changes that the transition to quantum government may entail, the Q Govt team are in discussions with Bastards for a Better Tomorrow to provide some unpopular but firm leadership in the event of civil opposition to these important new proposals.

Edit

IMPORTANT WRITING TIP! Our servers occasionally time out (usually after an hour)! So if you plan to spend more than a few minutes writing, why don't you prepare your text offline? When you're ready, refresh this page and then cut and paste your content here.

Nominate For A Badge

Badge:
More detail on badges

High Ping Quotient

HighPingQuotient

Longbroading

Longbroading

Open Authorship

OpenAuthorship

Cooperation Radar

CooperationRadar

Multi-Capitalism

MultiCapitalism

Mobbability

Mobbability

Protovation

Protovation

Influency

Influency

Signal/Noise Management

NoiseManagement

Emergensight

Emergensight



NOMINATE CANCEL